Film

Harakiri

Name: Harakiri
Genre: Action, Drama, History
Released: 1962
Cast: Tatsuya Nakadai, Akira Ishihama, Shima Iwashita, Tetsuro Tamba, Masao Mishima

Period drama
Very dark

Kobayashi's ronin drama opens as a quiet plea for dignity and slowly reveals itself as a demolition of the samurai code itself. Told largely through flashback, it moves at the pace of a held breath — formal, controlled, quietly furious — before erupting into one of cinema's great final reckonings. For anyone who thinks 'slow' and 'devastating' aren't mutually exclusive.

TMDb rating

4.2

Should you watch it?

Watch it if you like slow-burning period dramas where the craft of framing and stillness carries as much weight as the plot, and where the moral argument builds patiently until it lands like a blade.

Skip it if you need brisk pacing or constant motion, since much of the runtime is talk, measured waiting and deliberate silence before anything physical happens.

What it asks of you: Roughly two and a half hours of unhurried attention, with long static compositions and dialogue that rewards patience more than it rushes toward the next event.

Not sure? Find tonight's pick in a minute.

If you liked this

Samurai Rebellion1967

Kobayashi and Toshiro Mifune reunite five years later for another slow-fused takedown of samurai honor, this time about a father refusing to sacrifice his daughter-in-law to clan politics. Same director, same fury, sharper target.

But It's another patient, dialogue-heavy setup before violence — if Harakiri's pacing tested you, this asks for the same patience again.

The Sword of Doom1966

Nakadai again, but here he's the villain — a swordsman so nihilistic he can't stop killing even when he wants to. Brutal, bleak, and one of the great villain performances in the genre.

But It ends mid-story, unresolved by design, which some viewers find thrilling and others find maddening.

Yojimbo1961

Kurosawa's other essential samurai film from the same era — wry, muscular, hugely influential, with Mifune's wandering swordsman playing two corrupt factions against each other for sport.

But It's far more playful and comic than Harakiri's grave stillness — a genuinely different mood.

Not sure tonight? Get a pick in a minute, starting from Harakiri

The wildcard

Something you would not have found on your own.

Ikiru1952

Both films strip away institutional facade to expose the emptiness underneath — Harakiri does it through a clan's honor code, Ikiru through a city office's bureaucracy, and both end in one man forcing the institution to see itself.

A dying bureaucrat discovers his decades of work amounted to nothing, and spends his last months trying to matter. It's Kurosawa's quietest, most devastating film — no swords, all soul.

But It's a slow character study about paperwork and mortality; if you came for samurai, this has none.

Seven Samurai1954

The foundational epic that made the genre legible to the rest of the world — seven men, one village, and a masterclass in tension, character and staged violence everything after owes something to.

But At over three hours, it's a real commitment, and its warmth is a long way from Harakiri's cold precision.

Rashomon1950

Kurosawa's puzzle-box of conflicting testimonies invented a structural trick — truth fractured through perspective — that Harakiri's own layered flashbacks quietly inherit.

But It's more interested in epistemology than swordplay; if you wanted action, this is a slower, stranger creature.

Sanjuro1962

Same year as Harakiri, same star, opposite mood — a looser, funnier sequel to Yojimbo that still ends in a shockingly fast, brutal duel.

But It's a comedy for most of its runtime, which might feel jarring right after Harakiri's solemnity.

The Twilight Samurai2002

A quieter, more domestic take on the same era — a low-ranking samurai more concerned with his daughters' dinner than his sword, until duty catches up with him anyway.

But Little violence, less spectacle; it's a slow character study more than it is drama-with-a-blade.

Kagemusha1980

Kurosawa's late, painterly epic about a thief posing as a dead warlord — a meditation on identity, performance and the hollow shell power leaves behind.

But It's stately and deliberate even by jidaigeki standards, closer to opera than combat.

Ran1985

Kurosawa's Lear-in-feudal-Japan finale — vast battle scenes, operatic grief, and a devastating reckoning with legacy and inheritance that rhymes with Harakiri's own family tragedy.

But It's a bigger, more colorful spectacle than Harakiri's austere chamber piece — different scale entirely.

Chimes at Midnight1965

Both films dismantle a chivalric code from the inside — Falstaff's mockery of knightly honor and Tsugumo's quiet exposure of samurai hypocrisy are the same argument, made four centuries and two cultures apart.

Orson Welles's own ruined masterpiece — a Falstaff film assembled from Shakespeare's history plays, about honor as performance and the cost of a code that outlives its meaning.

But It's Elizabethan English on a shoestring budget, shot in grainy black and white — a very different texture from Kobayashi's polish.

Lone Wolf and Cub: Sword of Vengeance1972

Strip Harakiri's austerity away and you get this — the same wronged-ronin-versus-corrupt-clan structure, pushed into exploitation cinema, proving the story survives even when the dignity doesn't.

A disgraced samurai wanders Japan with his infant son and a baby cart rigged for slaughter — pulpy, gory, gloriously trashy, but built on the same bones as Harakiri: a ronin, a wronged family, a corrupt clan.

But It trades Kobayashi's restraint for arterial spray and grindhouse excess — tonally, they could not be further apart.