Film

Catch-22

Name: Catch-22
Genre: War, Comedy
Released: 1970
Cast: Alan Arkin, Martin Balsam, Richard Benjamin, Art Garfunkel, Jack Gilford

Mike Nichols' fractured, hallucinatory take on Heller's novel jumps around in time and tone, lurching from slapstick to horror without warning. It's less a war movie than a fever dream about bureaucratic logic trapping a man inside the very machine trying to kill him. Demanding and disorienting on purpose — best for viewers willing to feel unmoored.

TMDb rating

6.7

If you liked this

MAS*H1970

Altman's own war satire, released the same year, finds the same gallows humor in doctors going quietly mad amid carnage they can't stop — loose, irreverent, endlessly quotable.

But Its episodic looseness and dated gender jokes haven't aged as gracefully as its reputation suggests.

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb1964

The gold standard for turning military logic into pure lunacy — Kubrick's icy, precise satire skewers the same institutional madness with even tighter control.

But Black-and-white and Cold War specific; some targets need historical context to land fully now.

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb poster

The Graduate1967no page yet

Nichols' earlier triumph shows the same eye for awkward silences and institutional absurdity, aimed at suburbia instead of the Army.

But Its central romance plays queasier through modern eyes than it did in 1967.

The wildcard

Something you would not have found on your own.

To Be or Not to Be1942

Both weaponize absurdist comedy against real atrocity — Catch-22 does it in hindsight, decades later; this one did it live, in 1942, at genuine personal risk to everyone involved.

A Polish theatre troupe uses disguise and farce to outwit actual Nazis, made while the war was still being fought — comedy as live resistance, not hindsight.

But Some of the shtick and frantic pacing feel very much of their moment.

Full Metal Jacket1987

Kubrick again, tracking the same slide from dark comedy into horror as bureaucratic dehumanization curdles into violence — brutal, precise, unforgettable.

But The tonal whiplash is intentional but genuinely upsetting; not a comfortable watch.

Slaughterhouse-Five1972no page yet

Another fractured WWII adaptation from the same era, jumping through time to capture trauma's illogic — Vonnegut's fatalism meeting Heller's absurdism.

But Its sci-fi detour will frustrate anyone wanting a straight, linear war story.

Three Kings1999

Swaps eras for the Gulf War but keeps the same recipe — soldiers, absurd bureaucracy, sudden lurches into real violence and moral weight.

But David O. Russell's kinetic style is flashier and more visually aggressive than Nichols' controlled chaos.

Good Morning, Vietnam1987

Robin Williams turns institutional absurdity into comic fireworks, a lighter cousin to Yossarian's fight against an indifferent, illogical machine.

But Broader and more sentimental than Catch-22; the comedy tips further toward crowd-pleaser.

Kelly's Heroes1970

Same year, same war, opposite mood — a loose, funny heist-caper that treats WWII as a playground rather than a nightmare.

But Pure entertainment with none of the satire's bite; a palate cleanser, not a companion piece.

Jarhead2005

Trades punchlines for numbness, following soldiers stuck waiting for a war that never quite arrives — the same bureaucratic purgatory, minus the jokes.

But Deliberately anticlimactic pacing means it can feel like a slog by design.

Brazil1985

Same engine as Catch-22 — an individual crushed by self-perpetuating bureaucratic logic no one controls — reassembled as science-fiction dystopia instead of period war satire.

Terry Gilliam's dystopian nightmare traps its hero in paperwork and procedure as lethal as any bombing run — bureaucracy rendered as crushing, surreal fantasy.

But Its visual excess and fantastical detours will feel like a lot if you wanted something more grounded.

Paths of Glory1957

Same accusation — that an institution will sacrifice individuals to protect its own logic — delivered as straight tragedy instead of satire, showing the stakes without comedy's cushion.

Kubrick strips away every joke and shows exactly what military logic condemning innocent men looks like without laughs to soften it.

But Unrelentingly grim, with none of the manic energy that makes Catch-22 bearable to sit through.