Film
Time Masters
A 1982 French animated space opera about rescuing a stranded boy across a hostile alien world. Visually sumptuous, tonally strange—mixing pulpy adventure with genuine melancholy. It's deliberately paced, almost dreamlike, and utterly uninterested in explaining itself. For patient viewers who loved *Moebius* or want animation that feels like no other film.
Should you watch it?
Watch it if you love science fiction built on strange, painterly worlds and a quest where the imagery does more of the talking than the dialogue, the kind of animation that feels like turning pages in an illustrated novel.
Skip it if you want snappy dialogue and tight plotting; the pacing is deliberate and the characters can feel thinly sketched, so the mood may drift for anyone hoping for constant momentum.
What it asks of you: Roughly eighty minutes, with long stretches of slow, painterly looking and an unhurried rhythm; it rewards patience more than close tracking of plot logic.
Not sure? Find tonight's pick in a minute.
If you liked this
Moebius1996
Jodorowsky's surreal sci-fi masterpiece, equally visual and cryptic, built on the same philosophy that narrative clarity matters less than mood and imagery. A film that respects your intelligence by withholding easy answers.
But It's glacially slow, deeply weird, and the philosophical framework is deliberately obscure. You might finish it confused and frustrated rather than enchanted.

Heavy Metal1981
Anthology animation that channels pure pulp energy with a killer rock soundtrack. If you love hand-drawn sci-fi spectacle from this era, this is the rowdier cousin with more leather and explosions.
But It's juvenile in ways that have aged poorly, and the stories are paper-thin. Some sequences are genuinely ugly rather than stylish.

Fantastic Planet1973
Czech animated sci-fi that's equally surreal and meditative, using alien worlds to explore power and humanity. It shares Time Masters' commitment to visual strangeness over plot coherence.
But The pacing is deliberate to the point of hypnotic; some will find it dull rather than immersive. Animation is deliberately flat and austere.

Not sure tonight? Get a pick in a minute, starting from Time Masters
The wildcard
Something you would not have found on your own.
Stalker1979
Both films trust that confusion is not a failure. Both believe that mystery is more interesting than answers, and that mood matters more than plot.
Tarkovsky's ponderous masterpiece about a guide leading travelers into a mysterious zone. Not animated, not sci-fi in the pulp sense—but Time Masters shares its glacial pacing, its dreamlike logic, its belief that cinema should require patience as a form of respect.
But 163 minutes of philosophical Soviet cinema about desire and meaning. You do not watch this; you enter into a commitment with it. It can feel like staring at a wall.

More like this (8)
The Last Unicorn1982
Released the same year, similarly melancholic and gorgeous, with a quest structure and world-weary charm. It understands that sadness and wonder can occupy the same frame.
But It's slower than you'd expect from a fantasy adventure, and the voice acting is theatrical in a way that can feel mannered.

Fire and Ice1983
Animated sword-and-sorcery from the same moment, with stunning Frazetta-influenced visuals and a lean, kinetic plot. Shows what animation could do when budgets weren't micromanaged.
But The story is pure Saturday morning hokum, and the rotoscoped animation can feel stiff. It's all spectacle, no heart.

Akira1988
Cyberpunk animation that redefined what the medium could achieve technically and narratively. Shares Time Masters' commitment to a fully realized alien aesthetic.
But It's aggressively, deliberately confusing by design. The third act basically abandons plot for abstraction, which thrills some and alienates others.

Warriors of the Wind1984
Miyazaki's pre-Studio Ghibli masterpiece about traversing a dangerous alien ecosystem. Same sense of wonder and dread, but with a more coherent emotional core.
But It's become a gateway film that everyone knows, so discovering it feels less like finding treasure and more like catching up on homework.

Wizards1977
Ralph Bakshi's rotoscoped sci-fi fantasy about good and evil wizards in a post-apocalyptic world. Visually inimitable, tonal risk-taker, genuinely strange in how sincere it is.
But The rotoscoping technique looks cheap to modern eyes, and the pacing is erratic. Some sequences are risibly dated, others genuinely unsettling.

The Black Cauldron1985
Disney's darkest animated feature, full of genuine menace and visual invention. Proves animation wasn't required to be safe or cheerful.
But It's genuinely creepy in ways that can unsettle rather than delight, and the plot gets muddled in the third act. Also commercially flopped, which happened for reasons.

Paprika2006
Both films prove that animation can be for adults not because of violence or sex, but because they can sustain ideas and imagery that live-action simply cannot hold.
Satoshi Kon's hand-drawn fever dream about dreams bleeding into reality. Animation as pure visual narrative, where the medium itself IS the story—surreal, gorgeous, and structurally sophisticated in ways Time Masters intuited but couldn't fully execute.
But It's aggressively, almost obnoxiously stylish, and the plot (technology allowing dream-sharing) is almost irrelevant to the experience. Some viewers find it exhausting rather than exhilarating.

The Last Battle1983
Both films emerged from European art-cinema traditions skeptical of narrative clarity. Both say: trust the image, trust your intuition, let meaning emerge rather than being handed to you.
Jeunet and Caro's silent post-apocalyptic debut, entirely wordless and visually baroque. No dialogue forces you to read the world purely through design, color, and movement—the same surrender Time Masters demands.
But It's a silent film in 1983, shot in black and white with only ambient sound. The plot is deliberately fragmented. It feels like watching someone else's dream, which is either profound or pretentious depending on your mood.

People
Cast
Jean ValmontJaffar (voice)
Michel EliasSilbad (voice)- Frédéric LegrosPiel (voice)
Yves-Marie MaurinMatton (voice)
Monique ThierryBelle (voice)
Sady RebbotClaude (voice)- Patrick BaujinJad (voice)
- Pierre TourneurYula (voice)
Alain CunyXul (voice)
Yves BrainvilleGénéral (voice)
Michel BarbeyIgor (voice)- Jim BaumanLowry (voice)
Directing
- René LalouxDirector
Writing
- Jean GiraudAdaptation
- Jean-Patrick ManchetteDialogue
- Stefan WulNovel
- René LalouxScreenplay
- Jean GiraudWriter
- René LalouxWriter
Production
- Jacques DercourtDelegated Producer
- Roland GrittiDelegated Producer
- Michel GilletExecutive Producer
- Miklós SalusinszkyExecutive Producer
- Etienne LarocheProduction Manager
Recommended by
Button Moon, Unacknowledged, Ginga Nagareboshi Gin, Kaena: The Prophecy, Hard to Be a God, The Peak District, This Island Earth, The Island of Dr. Moreau, Phantom Power, Dust, Prisoners of the Lost Universe, The Story of Little Mook, Gandahar, Come Back, Africa, And Now for Something Completely Different, Project X