Film

The Uprising

Name: The Uprising
Genre: History, Drama
Released: 2026
Cast: Andrew Garfield, Jamie Bell, Stephen Dillane, Woody Norman, Tom Hollander

Period drama

A 14th-century epic about the Peasants' Revolt, where Andrew Garfield's unnamed ploughman becomes the spark for mass uprising against a corrupted crown. It's muscular, angry, and grounded—less *Braveheart* pageantry, more the grinding reality of desperation and collective power. For anyone who loves historical drama with genuine stakes and a cast that earns every frame.

TMDb rating

3.9

Should you watch it?

Watch it if you want a sweeping medieval uprising told through the bruised, weary faces of ordinary people, with politics that bite as hard as the swords.

Skip it if you want a brisk, lighter night out, since at 128 minutes and with plague and war weighing on every scene, it can feel heavy going.

What it asks of you: Settle in for over two hours of mostly grim, slow-building material, where the rebellion's momentum arrives in gathering waves rather than single punches.

Not sure? Find tonight's pick in a minute.

If you liked this

Braveheart1995

A towering epic about a commoner leading a nation against tyranny. Mel Gibson's passion and the battle sequences are operatic; it understands why people risk everything for freedom and dignity.

But Unabashedly sentimental and occasionally manipulative. The historical liberties are vast, and if you're tired of rousing speeches you'll find this exhausting.

The Crucible1996

A community fractures under fear and accusation. Daniel Day-Lewis embodies a man watching his world collapse; it's intimate, claustrophobic, and morally urgent in ways that haunt you.

But Based on the witch trials, which some find overly familiar. The pacing is deliberate and it never offers catharsis—just moral weight.

A Man for All Seasons1966

Paul Scofield as Thomas More standing against a king's will. It's dialogue-driven, intellectually rigorous, and finds heroism in quiet refusal rather than violence or spectacle.

But Staunchly theatrical and formally composed. If you want action or visual dynamism, this is essentially a filmed play with impeccable manners.

Not sure tonight? Get a pick in a minute, starting from The Uprising

The wildcard

Something you would not have found on your own.

Come and See1985

Both track the annihilation of civilian identity under the machinery of history. Your protagonist is unmade by forces larger than individual will or morality.

Elem Klimov's film follows a boy conscripted into a Soviet partisan unit during WWII. It is the most purely visceral account of war's dehumanization ever committed to film—and the most necessary.

But Genuinely unwatchable for many. Graphic violence, unrelenting despair, a climax designed to break you. It is not a film you enjoy; you survive it.

Andrei Rublev1966

Tarkovsky's meditation on art, faith, and survival across medieval Russia. Visually hypnotic and structurally daring; it asks what we owe to beauty and transcendence when the world is burning.

But Nearly three hours of contemplative, sometimes opaque cinema. Very slow. You must surrender to its rhythm entirely or it feels like a test of endurance.

Bloody Sunday2002

Paul Greengrass's you-are-there account of a massacre in Derry, 1972. Shot like a documentary and acted with documentary truth; it locates horror and heroism in ordinary people under extraordinary pressure.

But Visceral, graphic, and genuinely distressing. No narrative distance—you're embedded in chaos and violence. This is not entertainment.

The Lion King1994

Timothée Chalamet's young Henry V grapples with the weight of the crown and the cost of war. Visually stunning and structurally bold, with a moral clarity that political drama often avoids.

But Divisive reception. Some find it pretentious or emotionally cold; the final 40 minutes split audiences on its artistic choices and themes.

Wolf Hall2015

Peter Straughan's adaptation of Hilary Mantel's trilogy, with Mark Rylance as Cromwell. Intricate, darkly funny, and built on the idea that power is a conversation—not a battlefield.

But Based on dense source material and assumes you're paying close attention. Deliberately slow and interior; if you need plot momentum this will frustrate you.

The Last Kingdom2015

Nine seasons of Saxon warriors building a kingdom. It balances spectacle with character, fate with agency. If you want epic scope and genuine emotional weight across a full arc, it delivers.

But Uneven in quality across seasons and can drag. Some storylines resolve disappointingly; it's a Netflix show at heart, which means occasional tonal confusion.

Shōgun2024

Both ask what happens when an outsider or common person achieves influence in a rigidly stratified world. Both understand that real change requires navigating systems, not just disrupting them.

Rachel Kondo's miniseries about a shipwrecked English navigator navigating Japanese power politics in 1600. Dialogue-rich, visually sumptuous, and structured as a series of alliances and betrayals that reshape the world.

But A limited series, not a sprawl. The pacing is meditative and much of the drama lives in conversation rather than action. If you're watching for spectacle you'll be disappointed.

Stalker1979

Both measure the distance between what people believe they want and what the world will allow them to have. Both are elegiac—they grieve the gap between revolution and its aftermath.

Tarkovsky again, but this time science fiction. A guide leads two men through a forbidden zone toward a mysterious room. It is about desire, faith, and whether what we pursue is worth the cost of pursuit.

But 160 minutes of philosophical science fiction with almost no conventional plot. It is entirely interior and demands active surrender. Many find it maddening rather than transcendent.