Film

Ruthless People

Name: Ruthless People
Genre: Comedy
Released: 1986
Cast: Danny DeVito, Bette Midler, Judge Reinhold, Helen Slater, Anita Morris

A husband discovers his wife has been kidnapped—and he couldn't be happier. This 1986 farce watches three parties (the trapped wife, the baffled kidnappers, and her gleeful husband) spiral through increasingly absurd misunderstandings. It's screwball comedy at maximum velocity, fueled by perfect comic timing and the kind of unashamed cruelty that made '80s comedies so much fun. For anyone who loves ensemble chaos and characters making everything worse.

TMDb rating

3.3

Should you watch it?

Watch it if you love a nasty, gleefully amoral comedy where every character is scheming for the worst possible reason, and the punchlines land harder because nobody is trying to be likable, in the spirit of Mel Brooks at his most mean-spirited.

Skip it if you need a hero to root for or a warm, sentimental center; nearly everyone here is selfish, and the broad, shouty performances can wear thin over ninety-odd minutes.

What it asks of you: It runs a brisk 94 minutes and mostly asks you to sit back and enjoy the escalating chaos, accepting that the jokes are cruel and the tone stays loud and bright throughout.

Not sure? Find tonight's pick in a minute.

If you liked this

Trading Places1983

Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd navigate a brilliantly constructed con with perfect comic rapport. The script snaps with wit, the period detail is sumptuous, and it proves that broad comedy and genuine intelligence aren't enemies.

But It's a little slow in places, and some of the '80s racial humor hasn't aged as well as the rest of it.

Ghostbusters1984

Ensemble cast at peak chemistry (Murray, Aykroyd, Ramis, Hudson) riffing off each other while supernatural chaos unfolds around them. Hilarious and warmhearted without ever becoming sincere in a way that breaks the tone.

But It's been canonized to death. Watching it fresh feels almost impossible now.

Raising Arizona1987

The Coen Brothers' debut is a screwball kidnapping comedy (yes, really) that moves at breakneck speed with absurdist humor, gorgeous cinematography, and Nicolas Cage doing his Nicolas Cage thing before anyone knew what that meant.

But The baby-stealing premise will bother some viewers, and the anarchic tone means it's hard to predict where jokes are coming from.

Not sure tonight? Get a pick in a minute, starting from Ruthless People

The wildcard

Something you would not have found on your own.

A Fish Called Wanda1988

Both are capers built on the principle that everyone is working at cross-purposes, and the plot's momentum comes from characters actively making things worse for themselves through greed and spite.

A heist comedy that's also a brilliant screenplay about con artists destroying each other through lust and betrayal. It has the same ensemble chaos as *Ruthless People*, but with genuine wit, sexual tension, and Kevin Kline being absolutely unhinged.

But It's significantly smarter and less forgiving than you might expect from a comedy about criminals and stolen diamonds, which some viewers find unsettling.

The War of the Roses1989

A marriage implodes in spectacular, petty fashion, with Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner making destruction hilarious. It's *Ruthless People* 's darker twin—same premise, much meaner, and shocking in how far it goes.

But The tone shift from comedy to something genuinely unpleasant will feel jarring if you're expecting laughs all the way through.

After Hours1985

Griffin Dunne tumbles through a New York night where every encounter spirals further into chaos. It's a masterclass in escalation comedy—each scene logically worse than the last, held together by mounting dread and absurdity.

But It's intentionally claustrophobic and grimy, and there's a mean-spirited edge that won't land if you're not in the right headspace.

Coming to America1988

Eddie Murphy in a feel-good comedy with heart, charm, and a genuinely clever script about class and identity. James Earl Jones stealing scenes, fantastic music, and Arsenio Hall proving he's a brilliant foil.

But It's gentler and more earnest than the comedies around it, which means some viewers will find it slight.

Planes, Trains and Automobiles1987

Steve Martin and John Candy as mismatched travelers forced together by circumstance. It's hilarious but never mean; the affection between the characters is real, and it builds to something unexpectedly moving.

But The sentiment might feel saccharine if you're specifically looking for cruelty, and the pacing gets slower in the third act.

The 'Burbs1989

Tom Hanks leads suburban everyman paranoia comedy. It's a locked-room mystery played for laughs, with character actors getting perfect moments and an inexplicably appealing sense that everything is slightly off-kilter.

But The satirical target is very soft, and the mystery itself isn't particularly clever or surprising.

Three O'Clock High1987

A teenager must fight the school bully at 3pm; the entire day is a series of escalating obstacles. It's written like a thriller but played for comedy, with genuine suspense underneath the laughs and a great '80s teen-movie energy.

But It's built on a very high-concept premise that only works if you buy the conceit, and the humor is sometimes uneven.

The War at Home1979

Both films find comedy in marital hatred and the specific cruelty of people who know exactly how to wound each other, but this show goes *into* the wound rather than laughing at it.

A mockumentary sitcom about suburban family dysfunction that predates *Modern Family* by decades, using absurdist documentary framing to capture the specific misery of people trapped together by circumstance. It's dark and oddly painful.

But It has no laugh track and no obvious jokes; the humor is in the discomfort, and the production values are deliberately cheap, which reads as low-effort to viewers expecting broad farce.

Eating Raoul1982

Both films use kidnapping and the desire to murder a spouse as the engine for comedy, but *Eating Raoul* treats it as a logical problem (how do we solve this?) while *Ruthless People* treats it as a joke about who gets hurt first.

A couple murders the swingers who are ruining their apartment building. It's a pitch-black farce about escalating consequences, with the deadpan conviction that what you're watching is a normal domestic problem that just happens to involve murder.

But The entire premise is morally repugnant by design, played completely straight. It's transgressive humor that doesn't ask for forgiveness, and that will alienate viewers expecting any warmth.