Television series

Hollywood Squares

Name: Hollywood Squares
Released: 2003
Cast: Tom Bergeron, Shadoe Stevens, Whoopi Goldberg, John Moschitta Jr., Jeffrey Tambor

Comedy
Light-hearted
Dip in and out

Hollywood Squares is a gleefully silly game show where celebrities sit in a tic-tac-toe grid and lie or tell the truth in response to trivia questions. Contestants gamble on their answers to build three in a row. It's pure comedic chaos—the panel is full of working comedians and actors riffing, the stakes are delightfully low, and it's designed so everyone wins by having fun. Perfect if you want breezy, quotable entertainment that doesn't demand your full attention.

Should you watch it?

Watch it if you who enjoy quick-fire game shows where the fun is spotting a bluff and listening to celebrities trade one-liners, happy with a format that rarely changes.

Skip it if you need a story that builds, or the same setup repeated across every episode will wear thin once the novelty of the celebrity guesses fades.

What it asks of you: A brisk half-hour with a single board per episode, so you can dip in and out; attention stays light, with quick guesses rather than sustained focus.

Not sure? Find tonight's pick in a minute.

If you liked this

Match Game2016

The spiritual cousin of Squares—celebrities on a panel, games built on their personalities and improvisational wit. It's fast-paced, warm, and filled with moments where the jokes matter more than the score.

But If you need genuine suspense or high stakes, the outcomes feel predetermined by how charming someone is rather than how smart.

Password2022

The grandfather of all celebrity word games. Allen Ludden hosts with genuine charm, the celebrities are quick and clever, and the simplicity of the format means everything rides on personality and timing.

But It's black-and-white and paced like a 1960s talk show. If you need visual spectacle or modern editing, it'll feel slow.

Press Your Luck1983

The energy is electric—contestants control the pace, the game board is genuinely suspenseful, and it's lean enough to stay tight through a full episode. The Whammy has killed more dreams than any moment on Squares.

But It's entirely mechanical and offers no room for panelist personality. If you're watching for the people, this is purely about the players.

Not sure tonight? Get a pick in a minute, starting from Hollywood Squares

The wildcard

Something you would not have found on your own.

Whose Line Is It Anyway?1988

Both treat the game as a framework for watching funny people improvise. The points don't matter; the panel does.

British improv show where nothing matters, points are fake, and every game exists only to generate funny moments. Like Squares stripped to the skeleton—all panel, no game, all riffing. It's pure comedic confidence.

But There's no structure beneath the entertainment. If you need an actual game with rules and stakes, this will frustrate you. It's jazz, not chess.

To Tell the Truth1956

Celebrity panelists interrogate ordinary people claiming to be someone interesting; the celebrity judgment calls are hilarious. It works because the panel is genuinely trying to solve a puzzle, not just perform.

But The pacing is deliberate and measured. Modern viewers often find it mannered. You're signing up for a different rhythm than Squares.

Super Password1984

Password raised to a higher difficulty with celebrity partners. The competitive energy between pairs is sharp, the banter snappier, and it feels less like a game show and more like watching funny people play.

But If you haven't seen Password, this will feel like you're joining mid-conversation. It assumes you understand the foundation.

The Celebrity Dating Game2021

Pure improvisational chaos. Three eligible bachelors try to impress a bachelorette through flirtatious answers while a celebrity panel reacts. The questions are absurd, the reactions are genuine, and it moves at a sprint.

But Dating show premise feels dated and occasionally awkward by modern standards. Some bits don't land the way they did in 1966.

Name That Tune2021

Celebrity teams compete to identify obscure songs from minimal clues. It's energetic, unpredictable (people genuinely don't know the answers), and the game board pops visually. Tom Kennedy's hosting carries real warmth.

But If you don't know many songs from the 1950s-70s, you'll sit confused while celebrities compete on knowledge you don't share.

The Gong Show1976

Both are panels watching and reacting to performances. But where Squares is warm chaos, Gong Show is hostile-audience chaos—the celebrities are occasionally the threat, not the comic relief.

Terrible talent acts paraded before a celebrity panel who can stop them with a gong. It's unhinged, genuinely unpredictable, and the celebrity reactions are the entire point. Pure comedic chaos with real stakes—performers can bomb live.

But Acts are often painful to watch intentionally. It's cringe-adjacent and uneven. If you need most moments to land, this tests your tolerance.