Television series

All Rise

Name: All Rise
Genre: Drama, Legal
Released: 2019
Cast: Wilson Bethel, Jessica Camacho, J. Alex Brinson, Lindsay Mendez, Ruthie Ann Miles

All Rise is a courthouse ensemble drama that treats the LA legal system as a human ecosystem. It's warm and funny where you'd expect cynicism, genuinely invested in its judges, prosecutors and public defenders as people trying to do right by a broken machine. Ideally suited to anyone who likes legal procedurals but wants heart alongside the cases.

TVMaze rating

3.4

If you liked this

The Good Wife2009

Sharp writing, a protagonist discovering her own power, and the pleasure of watching smart people navigate institutional corruption. The legal cases matter but the character arcs matter more.

But Seven seasons is a commitment, and the middle stretch can feel repetitive. Some plots are engineered purely to split the will-they-won't-they.

Severance2022

A mystery that unfolds through character and atmosphere rather than exposition dumps. Morally intricate, visually striking, and built on the same principle: institutions warp everyone inside them.

But Slow-burn doesn't cover it. Episodes prioritize mood over plot momentum, and season one ends on an agonizing cliffhanger with no resolution date announced.

The Newsroom2012

Idealistic people inside a flawed institution trying to do the right thing, with Sorkin's machine-gun dialogue and the deep affection he has for his ensemble. Smaller scale than West Wing but fiercer in its arguments.

But Dated fast. The female characters are sometimes written as obstacles to male vision, and Sorkin's preachiness about the news business can overwhelm the drama.

Not sure tonight? Get a pick in a minute, starting from All Rise

The wildcard

Something you would not have found on your own.

The Trial of the Chicago 72020

Both center on ordinary people inside the legal system trying to push back against it. All Rise asks how you maintain integrity inside institutions; Chicago 7 asks what happens when you refuse to.

Sorkin's courtroom opus: politics, principle, and performance colliding in a real historical trial that reads as a fever dream. Explosive ensemble, enormous heart, genuinely moving despite its own theatricality.

But Rewrites history for dramatic purposes. If you care about fidelity to the actual 1969 trial, you'll notice the liberties and resent them.

Boston Legal2004

Funny and formally inventive: cases matter, but the show's real fuel is watching eccentric lawyers argue with each other and the system. Denny Crane is a triumph of character writing.

But Operates at the edge of satire so often that the genuine stakes can blur. The episodic cases are often secondhand retreads of real trials.

Suits2011

Slick, entertaining, unapologetic about prioritizing likability over realism. The central friendship is genuinely moving, and if you enjoy watching brilliant people talk fast and win, it delivers that pleasure reliably.

But The secret that drives early seasons becomes exhausting to maintain. Writing gets increasingly lazy once the show knows you're hooked.

How to Get Away with Murder2014

Viola Davis gives a masterclass in presence and moral ambiguity. The show keeps you off-balance; the twists land, the character work is real, and it's willing to let its protagonist be compromised.

But Mystery plotting grows convoluted and sometimes contradicts itself. By season five, you're watching more out of investment in Davis than because the plot holds water.

The Practice1997

Earnest, character-driven legal procedural where the defense team are the heroes and moral complexity is the point. It works as both a legal thriller and a character study.

But Genuinely 1990s in pacing and production design. Some episodes feel didactic, and certain cases haven't aged well in their assumptions.

Better Call Saul2015

Exquisite attention to detail and character. A lawyer becoming someone worse, shown through tiny choices and silences. Morally serious and often very funny.

But Slow in a way that requires patience. Some viewers find the legal cases less interesting than the moral trajectory, which is the whole point but not everyone's draw.

The Firm1993

Taut legal thriller with real stakes, a young lawyer realizing his dream job is actually a trap. Tom Cruise at his earnest best, and the procedural details feel lived-in.

But Dated in some ways. The corruption plot, while effective, doesn't surprise much in retrospect, and the film sometimes chooses spectacle over subtlety.

Rectify2013

Both show the legal system as just one part of a human story. Rectify goes further: it suggests the law's verdict might be irrelevant to what actually matters about a person.

A man released from death row tries to rebuild a life that no longer fits him. Hypnotic, dreamlike, more interested in psychological aftermath than procedural thriller beats. Aden Young is extraordinary.

But Glacially paced and deliberately unclear about guilt or innocence. Some viewers will find it deliberately evasive, and it asks enormous patience of the viewer.

Contempt1963

Both explore systems—legal and marital—that promise order but deliver something murkier. Both find human lives far more intricate than the official frameworks meant to contain them.

Godard's film about a marriage collapsing amid a movie production. Formally dazzling, gorgeously shot, and about the gap between what people claim to want and what they actually want from each other.

But Not a legal drama at all. 1960s experimental in structure and pacing. Requires tolerance for ambiguity and patience with a filmmaker more interested in ideas than plot.