Film

The Tortoise and the Hare

Name: The Tortoise and the Hare
Genre: Animation, Family, Fantasy
Released: 1935
Cast: Eddie Holden, Ned Norton, Pinto Colvig, Marcellite Garner, Dorothy Compton

Slapstick
Light-hearted
Dip in and out

Disney's 1935 Oscar-winning adaptation of Aesop's fable transforms a moral lesson into pure slapstick joy. Max Hare is a cocky showboat; Toby Tortoise is steady and kind. The nine minutes crackle with invention—rubber-limbed animation, physical comedy that still lands, and a race that feels genuinely suspenseful. It's a masterclass in how to make a simple story resonate.

TMDb rating

3.3

If you liked this

Cinderella1950

Disney's first animated feature after Snow White shows how the studio evolved. Same hand-drawn magic, more ambitious scope. The animation is gorgeous, and the emotional stakes—despite being about a ball gown—feel genuine.

But It's slower and more sentimental than a nine-minute short. Some scenes drag, and the heroine is passive in ways that modern audiences find frustrating.

Steamboat Willie1928

Mickey's debut shows where Disney came from: pure anarchic energy, no sentiment. It's the birth of synchronized sound animation. Raw, inventive, and you can feel the joy of discovering a new medium.

But It's primitive compared to later work. Mickey is barely a character—more a rubber shape that moves. Some may find it more historically important than actually fun.

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs1937

Released two years after this short, it proves Disney could scale up the charm without losing the magic. The dwarfs are comedy gold; the animation is breathtaking. It redefined what animation could do.

But It's 83 minutes, and the pacing is glacial by modern standards. The plot is thin, and Snow White herself is patient to the point of passivity.

Not sure tonight? Get a pick in a minute, starting from The Tortoise and the Hare

The wildcard

Something you would not have found on your own.

The Tale of the Fox1941

Both are fables told through animation, but where Disney made moral lessons warm and accessible, this French film makes them strange and unsettling. Same form, opposite temperature.

A stop-motion fable from France, made the same year as Snow White. It's bizarre, intricate, and operates by dream logic. The craftsmanship is staggering—each frame took weeks. It's what animation looked like when not made in Hollywood.

But It's methodical to the point of slow. Stop-motion moves differently than hand-drawn animation; if you expect Disney fluidity, you'll be frustrated. It also requires patience with a story that doesn't explain itself.

Fantasia1940

Disney at maximum ambition: no plot, just animation set to classical music. Some sequences are transcendent. It's utterly earnest about treating animation as high art, and moments of it genuinely are.

But Much of it is pretentious and boring. If you don't connect with the first sequence, you're in for a long evening. It's visually striking but narratively empty.

Dumbo1941

A shorter feature (64 minutes) with the same economy of storytelling as the short. It's charming, weird in places, and genuinely moving. The animation is gorgeous, and the pacing snaps.

But The human characters are thin and condescending. Some imagery is dated uncomfortably. And the plot relies on alcohol and hallucinations in ways that feel off now.

Peter Pan1953

Lighter and faster than some of Disney's other features. Nana the dog steals scenes; Hook is deliciously theatrical. It captures the anarchic joy of pretend play, which is what the best animation does.

But The Lost Boys are barely characters. The romance between Peter and Wendy is thin. The racism in some depictions is genuinely uncomfortable to sit with.

The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad1949

Two stories, two different tones: the chaos of Mr. Toad and the Gothic melancholy of Sleepy Hollow. It's varied enough to stay interesting, and the animation in both is excellent.

But Two stories means neither gets full development. If one doesn't grab you, you're watching the wrong half. It feels assembled rather than directed.

The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad poster

Song of the South1946

Same director, same era, same studio pushing animation forward. But where this short is pure storytelling, Song of the South uses animation to sand down the edges of American racism. Both are products of their moment—this one shows what that moment cost.

A live-action film with animated sequences directed by Wilfred Jackson, who also directed this short. The animation is inventive and bright; the live sections have genuine warmth. It's a technical achievement in mixing mediums.

But The historical context is toxic—it's essentially pro-plantation propaganda. The racism is baked into the DNA of the film, not incidental. Watching it requires confronting art made in service of a hateful cause.

Charlotte's Web1973

Both are fables distilled to their essence—one about ambition, one about mortality. But where the Hare and Tortoise are played for laughs and moral clarity, Charlotte's Web argues that meaning comes from connection, not from winning. Same genre, opposite philosophy.

A made-for-TV animated special about friendship and mortality. It's gentle without being cloying, and it trusts its audience to sit with sadness. The animation is simple but expressive; the voice cast is perfect. A grief story told without cynicism.

But It's very quiet and very sad. There's no action; it's dialogue and character. If you want spectacle or excitement, this is the wrong choice. Some find the ending devastating rather than moving.