Film
Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe
Vaxxed presents claims that the CDC concealed data linking the MMR vaccine to autism. The film argues for a cover-up at the highest levels of public health authority, built around testimony from a former CDC researcher. It's confrontational, accusation-based filmmaking made for people convinced institutional medicine cannot be trusted.
Should you watch it?
Watch it if you enjoy investigative documentaries that chase a paper trail and want to see a contested claim argued on screen, as long as you can weigh its evidence yourself.
Skip it if you want the science laid out fairly, since the film's central claim is one most researchers have rejected and it argues its case without much counterweight.
What it asks of you: Ninety-one minutes of interviews, documents and talking heads, mostly one-sided, with a slow build of indignation rather than any mystery to unravel.
Not sure? Find tonight's pick in a minute.
If you liked this
An Inconvenient Truth2006
A documentary that builds a case for an unpopular scientific claim against institutional resistance. Strong visual evidence, passionate central figure, argues that consensus has gotten things dangerously wrong.
But The climate science has held up far better than the claims here. Watching persuasive advocacy for something incorrect can feel like a waste of your evening.

The Bleeding Edge2018
Investigates how medical devices reach patients without adequate safety testing. Real harms documented, real accountability gaps revealed. Argues regulatory capture is real and measurable.
But Focuses on orthopedic and gynecological devices rather than vaccines, so the parallel won't feel perfectly tight to you.

Spotlight2015
Reporters uncover institutional deception at scale, following evidence to challenge powerful authorities. Methodical, tense, about the real work of proving cover-ups exist and matter.
But Built on a genuine scandal with documented evidence, which makes it a very different animal than a film built on discredited claims.

Not sure tonight? Get a pick in a minute, starting from Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe
The wildcard
Something you would not have found on your own.
Rashomon1950
Both films present claims with conviction. This one is about whether conviction itself is evidence, and what happens when we can't agree on what we saw.
Four people describe the same crime completely differently, all convincingly. Kurosawa's masterpiece about how perspective shapes truth and eyewitness testimony proves almost nothing. Watch it if you care about how we actually know things.
But Japanese film from 1950 in black and white. Philosophical rather than urgent. Doesn't give you the satisfaction of certainty—it takes it away.

More like this (7)
The Plot Against America2020
HBO alternate history about what happens when institutions fail and misinformation spreads through communities. Explores how conspiracy thinking takes root in ordinary people during crisis.
But It's fiction, not journalism. If you want to feel validated in your views rather than challenged, this won't scratch that itch.

Dark Waters2019
A lawyer takes on a chemical company and the EPA over toxic contamination. Real story of systemic failure, corporate deception, and one person's refusal to accept official denials.
But The villain here is demonstrably real and documentable in ways that don't apply to all institutions equally. Specificity of guilt matters.

The Pharmacist2020
A grieving pharmacist investigates his son's overdose and uncovers how pharmaceutical companies pushed opioids. Combines personal tragedy with institutional accountability in a way that feels earned.
But Another story of real corporate malfeasance—watching it might make you angry at the right target but frustrated with blanket distrust of all medicine.

Pandemic: How to Prevent an Outbreak2020
Netflix documentary following public health officials during COVID. Shows real people trying to do real work under impossible conditions, with genuine doubt and adaptation happening in real time.
But It's sympathetic to institutional medicine and experts. If you came to feel that sympathy is naive, you'll find this frustrating.

The Toys That Made Us2017
A model for how to investigate a cultural phenomenon with nuance. Includes criticism and praise, shows how decisions get made, doesn't pretend everything was intentional or everyone was honest.
But It's about toys, not health. Sometimes you want a break from high-stakes questions, and sometimes that break feels trivializing.

Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media1992
Chomsky and Herman's media criticism applied to real news stories. Rigorous argument about how narratives get shaped by power and profit, with archival evidence throughout.
But Dense theoretical framework. If you want accessible anger rather than systematic analysis, it can feel academic and slow.

Bombshell2019
Both involve insiders claiming a powerful organization hid dangerous truth. This one lets you see what verification, evidence, and accountability actually look like in practice.
How Fox News reporters revealed sexual harassment and corporate cover-up from inside a trusted institution. Shows real whistleblowing in real time, with costs, doubt, and a system that protects power first.
But The whistleblowers succeed through conventional institutions—courts, media, HR structures—and the film believes in those systems. If institutional solutions feel hollow to you, this will disappoint.

People
Cast
- Brian S. HookerSelf
- Polly TommeySelf
- James M. SearsSelf
- Mark BlaxillSelf
- Sheila EaleySelf
- Brandy VaughanSelf
- Dan BurtonSelf
- Dr. Rachel RossSelf
Andrew WakefieldSelf
Directing
- Andrew WakefieldDirector
Writing
- Andrew WakefieldWriter
- Del Matthew BigtreeWriter
Production
- Dawna ShumanAssociate Producer
- Francesca AlesseAssociate Producer
- Andrew WakefieldProducer
- Brian BurrowesProducer
- Del Matthew BigtreeProducer
- Kelly GallagherProducer
- Lee NestorProducer
- Polly TommeyProducer
- Rana Joy GlickmanProducer
- Michael ShahoudProduction Consultant