Film

Ramanujan

A biographical drama about the mathematical prodigy Ramanujan, from his struggles in poverty-stricken Tamil Nadu to his collaboration with Cambridge mathematician G. H. Hardy. It's a portrait of genius emerging against impossible odds, told with patience and visual beauty. For anyone moved by stories of transcendence through intellect, or curious about the life behind one of mathematics' most luminous names.

Should you watch it?

Watch it if you are drawn to quiet biographical portraits where the rigor of an idea matters as much as the people wrestling with it, and you don't mind a story that moves at the speed of careful thought.

Skip it if you want the mathematics to feel thrilling or the drama to escalate; this one is measured, often gentle, and its long running time can feel stretched by its unhurried scenes.

What it asks of you: Expect a long, patient sitting of nearly three hours, with slow stretches, intimate domestic moments, and a steady, reflective tone rather than sharp turns or constant momentum.

If you liked this

The Man Who Knew Infinity2016

Another telling of Ramanujan's story, with Dev Patel in the lead and Jeremy Irons as Hardy. Glossier and more accessible, it frames the relationship between mentor and student as the emotional core, and the mathematics as almost secondary.

But Released just a year later, it risks feeling redundant. If you want the Indian perspective and cultural grounding, this American-inflected version may feel distanced.

The Man Who Knew Infinity poster

A Beautiful Mind2001

Russell Crowe as John Nash, another mathematician undone by his own mind. Like Ramanujan, it's about genius in isolation, but Nash's struggle is internal—mental illness rather than circumstance. Powerfully acted and genuinely moving.

But Veers into melodrama in ways that feel unearned. Some find it simplistic about both genius and mental health. Also three hours long.

A Beautiful Mind poster

The Imitation Game2014

Benedict Cumberbatch as Alan Turing, cracking the Enigma code while battling prejudice and his own nature. Same year as Ramanujan, same DNA—a singular mind, a historical moment, the cost of genius to the person living it.

But It takes historical liberties that historians have objected to. The dramatic tension sometimes overrides accuracy. And it's another 'brilliant outsider' story, which can feel familiar.

The Imitation Game poster

Not sure tonight? Get a pick in a minute, starting from Ramanujan

The wildcard

Something you would not have found on your own.

Kes1970

Both are about exceptional minds in circumstances determined to crush them. In Kes, escape is temporary and ultimately denied. In Ramanujan, escape is real but bought at a cost. Both ask: what is genius worth if the person who has it must be remade to be acceptable?

Ken Loach's film about a working-class Yorkshire boy who discovers a wild kestrel and finds, in that relationship, something like grace. No mathematics, no genius as the world measures it—but the same story at its core. Genius isn't always recognised by institutions. Sometimes it's just a boy who sees something others don't, and that seeing transforms him.

But Black and white, 1960s regional British cinema. Slow. Heartbreaking without resolution. The boy doesn't escape; the world doesn't change.

Kes poster
More like this (6)

The Theory of Everything2014

Eddie Redmayne as Stephen Hawking across decades of his life. A gentler film than you might expect—less about the physics, more about love, determination, and the person inside the equations. Beautifully shot and unexpectedly intimate.

But Some find it saccharine. Hawking's actual life and marriage were far messier, and the film softens the edges considerably.

The Theory of Everything poster

Oppenheimer2023

Christopher Nolan's epic about the physicist and the Manhattan Project. Far broader in scope than Ramanujan, but it shares the fascination with a towering intellect navigating power, morality, and the consequences of what they've created.

But Three and a half hours, fractured timeline, and Nolan's usual density. You have to surrender to the film entirely—it doesn't make concessions to impatience.

Oppenheimer poster

Slumdog Millionaire2008

Danny Boyle's film about an Indian boy from the slums competing on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. Like Ramanujan, it's a story of transcendence through intellect and circumstance, and it finds beauty in India's streets and desperation.

But The poverty is aestheticised. Some feel the film is more interested in the romance of struggle than in the actual lives of struggling people. Also structurally manipulative.

Slumdog Millionaire poster

Moneyball2011

Brad Pitt as Billy Beane, using mathematics and unconventional thinking to build a baseball team on a budget. The joy here is watching someone see patterns no one else sees. Less about human cost, more about the elegance of the solution itself.

But It's a sports film, which narrows its appeal. And it's more interested in being a crowd-pleaser than in moral complexity.

Moneyball poster

The Crown2016

If you want another portrait of a life constrained by duty, historical circumstance, and the weight of being exceptional. It's not about mathematics, but it understands the toll of being watched, judged, and expected to be perfect.

But Sprawling, sometimes slow, and its historical accuracy is hotly debated. The later seasons soften into soap opera. You need to want to live inside the show for five seasons.

The Crown poster

Proof2005

Ramanujan asks what mathematics costs when you're poor and foreign. Proof asks what it costs when you're a woman and your father was a genius. Both are about minds in impossible positions, but Proof inverts the gender and asks about the cost of legacy rather than recognition.

Gwyneth Paltrow as Catherine, a young woman struggling with her father's legacy—he was a legendary mathematician, and now she's drowning in his notebooks, uncertain whether her own contributions are real or inherited delusion. It's cerebral, bitter, and utterly alive. Anthony Hopkins is heartbreaking.

But Claustrophobic and psychologically unsettling. The film doesn't let you settle into comfort. Math is almost incidental—this is about inheritance, self-doubt, and the weight of being someone's daughter.

Proof poster

People

Cast

Directing

Recommended by